Saturday, 29 December 2012

Travels with Li Dongni - Pompeii, Italy (December 2012)

Writing travel posts about the really famous sites of the world is definitely harder than writing about some Han Dynasty watchtower in the middle of China's Taklamakan desert. Lots of people know the site, have been there themselves and have seen a dozen TV documentaries about it. Not to mention the T-shirt collection...

So like most travel posts, this one will have some of my favourite images and talk about some of the quirks I found whilst there rather than attempt to provide an in depth interpretation of Pompeii. If you want one of those, then you could do far worse than pick up Mary Beard's wonderfully engaging book on life in the ancient city.

Our visit to Pompeii occurred during a 6 day trip to Naples to visit a friend and colleague of my wife, who is local and has a passionate (and almost encyclopaedic) knowledge of her local heritage. Good news for us then!

We headed out early to ensure we had a full day to look around, but almost didn't get there at all as two 'Circumvesuviana' trains in succession were cancelled without explanation. Even the locals were getting confused and a little ratty as time passed.  Thankfully one finally arrived and we got to Pompeii slightly later than planned, but at least we were there.

One good thing about visiting in December is of course that you miss the major crowds, and we were doubly blessed with clear blue skies after torrential rain the night before. I had my trusty list of essential properties and buildings to visit, so after a quick look around the forum, we set off up the main street - the Via D'Abbondanza - towards the amphitheatre at the other end of the town, taking note of various buildings and the wonderful cobbled streets, and funky stepping stones, on the way.  Speaking of the latter, it's amazing that broken ankles weren't a major problem in Pompeii!










Beside the Forum is an open storage area, with an interesting array of amphorae and some of Pompeii's famous plaster bodies.  These are the result of the 19th Century realisation that the bodies of the unfortunate inhabitants caught up in the disaster had left perfect body-shaped voids in the layers of ash as they had decomposed.  By pouring plaster into these voids,  'models' (complete with skeletons) of the individuals could be obtained.





A small number of other such bodies are visible across the site, though not as many as you might imagine.










The amphitheatre is famous for a brawl that took place there in AD59, and for being the first Roman amphitheatre built in stone.  The brawl was so severe that gladiatorial games were banned in the city for ten years.  A wonderful fresco from the city shows the riot in progress, as well as the distinctive staircases into the seating.








We then wandered back through the city, hopping from one famous dwelling to the next, taking in the streetscape as we went.  Sadly, unlike Herculaneum, the huge majority of properties were closed off so many famous sights, such as the House of Octavius Quarto, the Garden of the Fugitives and the House of Menander had to go unseen.  Don't start crying for us just yet, though, as many fantastic elements were open.

No trip to Pompeii is complete without a trip to the brothel.  Like many, I subscribe to the opinion that the quantity of brothels in Pompeii has been massively overemphasised, and this structure probably represents the only 'formal' brothel in the city, dodgy backrooms in inns notwithstanding.  Having never been to a modern brothel, I have no grounds for comparison, but its fair to say that the ancient example definitely feels like a seedy place!










An interesting insula in the south of the city contains two theatres (one larger theatre and a smaller, covered one) and the famous Temple of Isis.  Although the theatres aren't the largest or most impressive I've seen (that title has to go to Aspendos in Turkey), the urban setting gives them a wonderful context as they nestle within the tight streets.  The Temple of Isis is far from its former glory but the sense of an urban temple within a walled precinct is unique and the frescoes, which are now in the Naples museum, are wonderful.










A highlight of any Roman site is the baths, but the examples at Pompeii (and Herculaneum too for that matter) are truly staggering, and provide a wonderfully evocative impression of the public bathing experience, though the small size of some rooms suggests that it could get very crowded.  There are three bath complexes in Pompeii - the Suburban baths, the Stabian baths and the Forum baths.  The first set of images below are of the Stabian baths, surrounding an attractive open palaestra (exercise yard).












The Forum baths are much smaller, but have recently reopened following renovation and are notable for the little Atlas-like figures holding up the columns of the clothes cubicles in the men's apodyterium.








One of the famous houses in Pompeii is the fantastically named 'House of the Tragic Poet', a house which, by no means enormous, contained many high quality mosaics and frescoes, often depicting mythological scenes.  Its most famous feature is the mosaic at the threshold, warning visitors to 'beware of the dog'.  Sadly, the mosaic was hemmed in by chicken wire and in strong shadow, making it difficult to appreciate, let alone photograph.







The largest house in Pompeii is known as the 'House of the Faun', after a statue found in the atrium, now in the Naples Museum.  The pavement outside the house bears a welcoming 'HAVE' mosaic, but the highlight is the Alexander mosaic, found in a room surrounding the garden.  A replica is in situ (not highlighted as such to any unsuspecting visitors not aware that the original has been removed), as the original is also in the Naples Museum.







Alongside houses and public buildings, Pompeii contained a variety of business premises.  The images below show some of the bakeries and thermopolia (streetside hot food stalls) to be found as you wander the streets.





One of most illuminating aspects of Pompeii's preservation is the amount of graffiti that has survived.  Although the surviving frescoes of mythological scenes are wonderful, the graffiti, electoral slogans, lararia (shrines found in houses and shops) and shop signs add a level of personal detail that nowhere else in the Roman world can match.  Sadly, a number of the better examples were hidden behind scaffolding during our visit, but many were still visible, protected behind perspex.  Having them retained in situ, rather than in a museum context really helps to bring the site to life.  Also pictured below are some of the carved signs to be found on the streets, including some lucky phalluses (if you like this sort of thing, compare them to the ones from north west England I wrote about here).
















Like most visitors, we left Pompeii via the Heculaneum gate, walking past the rows of mausolea which were once common sights lining the roads out of all Roman towns.





The final stop on any visit to Pompeii has to be the Villa of the Mysteries, to be found a few hundred yards outside of the walls.  This large house is famous for the frescoes that give it its name - the images of the Dionysic mysteries that adorn the walls of the triclinium (dining room).  To view these required peering through wooden slatted windows which was far from perfect, but the quality of the artwork and its survival is impressive, to say nothing of the light they have shed on a secretive Roman cult.











Pompeii is certainly an unusual place to visit, but I confess its only now, looking back, that the amazing scale and preservation really sinks in.  While there, its almost difficult to get your mind to realise exactly what you're seeing.  One of the hardest things to do while I was there was to correlate the physical remains with the lives of the individuals who lived there, and whom I'd read about before visiting.  I wonder, as the interpretation on site is so slim, just how much general tourists really understand about what they are seeing.  Perhaps, though, that's the beauty of Pompeii - its one of the few archaeological sites in the world that actually does speak for itself.





Other ‘Travels with Li Dongni’ posts



Wednesday, 26 December 2012

Roman 'cockpit theatre' discovery and archaeology in the media

The internet today brought news of an interesting Roman discovery in Faversham, Kent. The Kent Archaeological Field School have discovered the remains, literally in their own back yard, of a Roman theatre.  What makes the discovery particularly unusual is that they believe that it is an example of a 'cockpit theatre', used for religious observations rather than (or perhaps as well as) theatrical performances.  The theatre seems to have been built into the hillside and had two other potential temples or shrines and a sacred spring close by, so may have formed part of a wider area of religious focus.  It could potentially hold 12,000 people.

Around 150 such cockpit theatres are apparently known from northern Europe (I say apparently as I'm trusting the media's figures here) but this is the first from Britain.  If the initial interpretation is confirmed, then it is potentially a very interesting discovery indeed, and may lead to the reinterpretation of other such sites across the country.  I have to say though that I'll wait to read more about the discovery in an academic journal before jumping to accept the current interpretation wholeheartedly - its easy to get carried away with such 'sacred sites' headlines and theatres in the Roman world are known to have used for a variety of public activities.

The story was mainly reported by the Daily Mail, and although I'm not a fan of their brand of scaremongering, they do have to be given some credit for their general highlighting of archaeological discoveries.  However, the content of their articles is, as always, to be taken with a pinch of salt.  One particularly funny aspect of this story is that the headline, which seems to have been picked up by other news agencies referred to the discovery of a 'Bronze Age Roman theatre'.  Now, the site did reveal traces of Bronze Age occupation, but surely it wasn't too hard for the journalist to realise that the Bronze Age and Roman Britain aren't the same thing?  Maybe this is just more proof that knowledge of the basics of British history, and prehistory in particular, really are lacking in our society.


Wednesday, 12 December 2012

Off to Naples - one for the bucket list

As regular readers of this blog will know (check out my travel posts if not), I've been fortunate to able to do a little bit of travelling in my life and seen some amazing things.  As an archaeologist with an interest in the Roman world, though, its always been my shame that I've never been to see some of the most famous Roman remains of all - Pompeii and Herculaneum.  Well, I'm pleased to report that that will soon change!  Well, barring catastrophe of course...

My wife and I will tomorrow be jetting off to Naples for a week with the intention of seeing not only the 'big two', but also places like Poppea's villa at Oplontis, Vesuvius itself and of course the National Archaeological Museum in Naples.  Ridiculous quantities of camera SD cards are packed, so I've got everything I need!

Expect lots of excited blogging upon our return, if of course we don't do the proverbial after 'Seeing Naples'...

Sunday, 9 December 2012

Bronze at the Royal Academy

On Friday I managed to get chance to visit the Royal Academy's well-hyped Bronze exhibition just before it closes (though the pedant in me thinks it should should surely have been called 'Copper Alloy'). The main draw for me, as I suspect it was for many other archaeologists, was to see the controversial Crosby Garrett helmet on public display for the first time, but more of that shortly.

I'm always slightly wary of art exhibitions that feature archaeology, as the tendency is to show archaeology as little more than a source of 'ancient art' - of interest purely for its aesthetic value. I was also a little perturbed by the entrance price of £15, though I'm conscious that my membership of the Museums Association means I get into most museum exhibitions in the country free, and thankfully avoid the costs that 'normal', full price paying visitors have to stump up each time. It certainly has an effect on the way you view and experience an exhibition.

The first thing to say is that the selection of objects was simply stunning - the chronological and geographical variety was very well planned and executed. The curators deserve applause for a wonderfully successful mixture of the spectacular and the unusual, the ancient and the modern. I never knew what would be round the next corner, but I was never disappointed when I turned it.

The thematic arrangement worked well, allowing objects to be logically grouped, but in themes wide enough to retain a sense of variety in each room. Although often overlooked, whoever did the lighting also deserves credit, as great use was made of dramatic lighting without causing distracting shadows or blinding the audience.

One minor gripe would be the labelling. Why was there only one label for each object when there was clearly space for the label to be repeated, stopping crowds of people jostling for position to read it? Also, the interpretation had a tendency to fall into the minimalist 'art' category, when some objects were crying out to have more detailed stories told. Often, crucial details about an object appeared on the introductory panels to each room rather than on the object label itself.

There was also some odd juxtapositioning of objects, labels and wall panels which caused avoidable bottle necks. This was most notable in the very first room, where the single tiny label for the large 'Dancing Satyr' statue (on a large flat plinth) was placed at the same corner of the room as the introductory text on the wall, causing people to congregate in one tiny space and struggle to read either text properly.

Every exhibition of this type brings you into contact with objects and artworks you didn't know existed, and Bronze had some memorable moments indeed. I'm sure I'm far from the only visitor struck by the scale, drama and sheer quality of the large scale Perseus holding aloft Medusa's severed head.

I was also pleased to discover a gilded Romano-Gaulish statuette of Mercury that I didn't know existed, though it was portrayed with such musculature that without the caduceus it was holding, it would surely have looked more like Hercules!

So what about the Crosby Garrett helmet, the star of the show for those of us who have followed its controversial history since discovery? Naturally, and understandably considering it is on loan from its mysterious new owner, the exhibition label made no reference at all to its discovery, auction sale or the questions it has raised about the aptness of the current description of 'treasure' under the 1996 Act.

Despite being an undoubtedly spectacular object, I'm afraid seeing it made me feel more sad than awestruck - its immaculate appearance the result of hurried restoration to maximise auction profit rather than careful conservation to reveal archaeological information. A textbook example of an important archaeological object turned into a shiny art exhibit. I'm afraid I'd rather have been at Tullie House museum in Carlisle looking at 60-odd pieces of stabilised metal with a reconstruction drawing of 'how it might have looked' than the shiny, over restored objet d'art presented here. It certainly draws comparisons with the lengthy and painstaking archaeological conservation work that has been done on another recent Roman cavalry helmet find - from the Hallaton site, now on display at the wonderful Market Harborough Museum.

Overall though, I won't let my niggles over the legal status of archaeological finds detract from an excellent and eye-opening show, which proved itself worthy of that entrance fee.

Friday, 26 October 2012

Stories from The Collection #5 - 'Julia Maesa denarius ring bezel'

This is the fifth in a series of posts about recent acquisitions to the collections of The Collection: Art and Archaeology in Lincolnshire.

This article was published in the Autumn 2012 issue of ‘Lincolnshire Past and Present’ magazine, published by the Society for Lincolnshire History and Archaeology.


The Collection has recently acquired an unusual piece of Romano-British jewellery.  The item in question is the bezel of a ring made from a Roman coin.  Although the hoop of the ring is lost and only the bezel survives, it is nonetheless a most unusual and noteworthy addition to the county's archaeological collections.

Click to enlarge


The bezel was discovered at Ulceby with Fordington, between Alford and Spilsby in March 2011 and reported as treasure.  Although single coin finds are not classed as treasure under the definition in the 1996 Treasure Act, the conversion of this coin into an item of jewellery makes it eligible.

The coin is a silver denarius of Julia Maesa, minuted in Rome between AD220 and AD222.  The obverse shows the draped bust of Julia Maesa, the reverse the figure of Felicitas, the personification of good fortune, holding a long caduceus whilst sacrificing over an altar.  The reverse legend, now almost entirely lost, reads 'SAECVLI FELICITAS' - which optimistically translates as 'the happiness of the age'.

Julia Maesa herself was a member of one of the most interesting of Imperial dynasties, the Severans, and related to a number of Emperors.  She was the sister-in-law of the Emperor Septimus Severus, grandmother of the Emperors Elagabalus and Alexander Severus and the aunt of the Emperor Caracalla and his murdered younger brother Geta.  Far from being a passive figure, she actively involved herself in Imperial politics, particularly in her successful plot to overthrow the Emperor Macrinus and replace him with Elagabalus.

This type of reuse of a coin is extremely rare in Britain, though the practice is better evidenced on the continent.  This example is particularly interesting for the fact that it is the reverse of the coin that was chosen for display in the ring, rather than the portrait.  This strongly suggests that it was the fortuitous attributes of Felicitas that were sought or promoted by the wearer, and the Imperial imagery of decidedly lesser importance.  Of course, the conversion from coin to ring may have occurred many years after the death of Julia Maesa herself, and after the coin had ceased to be legal tender.

The Collection is grateful to both the finder and the landowner for waiving their rights to a reward and donating the bezel to the museum.