Wednesday 16 May 2012

The Petrie Museum and old-school goodness


I don't like to do 'reviews' of museums because a) it makes me feel like a student again and b) I end up picking faults, which I hate doing as (any museum curator will tell you) all galleries are full of little foibles and errors that the curator wants to find time (or money) to put right. I'd never want to take the moral high ground and start pointing fingers at my fellow curators for any such glitches in their galleries.

But the museum I want to talk about is one that I am going to pick some faults with, because somehow they are exactly what make the place special - the Petrie Museum - which I managed to pop into on a recent visit to London.

The Petrie Museum is the UCL (University College London) museum of Egyptology, named for the great pioneering archaeologist Sir William Flinders Petrie whose excavations provided the museum with the bulk of its collections.

The displays are unashamedly old fashioned, and without wanting to insult anyone responsible for them, a little ramshackle. Objects can be found crammed into old wooden cases with barely a gap between them and turned at different angles on shelves that are too small. Labels are sometimes handwritten, sometimes entirely illegible as they are covered by objects or packaging and they are often wonky. Even when you can read them, the information is usually brief, technical, and of little use to the casual visitor.





 
Although these would often be fatal errors in a modern museum, in the Petrie they somehow seem to simply add to the atmosphere of a place which is packed full of wonderful treasures.  They portray a sense of charm and character - two of the hardest qualities for a museum to possess in my opinion.

The idea behind the labelling is of course to retain a sense of exploration - that feeling of the early archaeologists like Petrie making new discoveries and trying to understand and categorise their finds.  The museum actually feels like if you came back a month later, some exciting new find would have caused everything to be re-organised and re-interpreted.

So if you happen to be in London and looking for somewhere new to visit, head along to the Petrie Museum and revel in some unashamedly old fashioned, dusty shelved and vaguely eccentric museum loveliness.  After all, how can anyone fail to become fond of a museum that openly offers torches to visitors because the lighting isn’t very good?


Tuesday 15 May 2012

Images from Eyam

My wife and I had a lovely day this Sunday hiking around the historic village of Eyam in the Peak District.  Despite the best attempts of the public footpath signs to drown us in bogs and leave us confused by having paths suddenly splitting into multiple, unsigned, routes, we had a good ramble with only a pleasant amount of getting lost.  I therefore thought I'd share with you some of the photos that my trusty camera and I managed to capture along the way.


















Saturday 12 May 2012

Stories from The Collection #3 - 'Erotic Roman knife handle'

This is the third in a series of posts about the archaeological objects in the collections of The Collection: Art and Archaeology in Lincolnshire.

This article was published in the Spring 2012 issue of ‘Lincolnshire Past and Present’ magazine, published by the Society for Lincolnshire History and Archaeology.


Many archaeological objects that come to the museum's attention are common types of find, of known typologies and designs.  Other objects raise rather more of an eyebrow in terms of their rarity and imagery.  This late Roman knife handle is one such object.

The handle was discovered by a metal detector user at Syston, near Grantham, in March 2007 and recorded with the Portable Antiquities Scheme.  The museum subsequently purchased the handle from the finder.

The handle is copper alloy and 64mm long.  Two rivet holes at the base of the handle illustrate that the blade was fixed, unlike many other decorative Roman knives which had folding blades.  It is the imagery on this knife, however, that sets it apart from the majority of other examples.



The openwork design shows three figures – a larger male, a smaller male and a female, all interacting in an erotic scene.  The larger, possibly older, male stands on the right of the scene, his feet resting on a small ledge.  The woman sits astride the older male, with her legs raised around his waist.  The smaller or younger male is on the left, back to back to the female, being held by her arms and with his legs crouched.  In his hands the smaller male holds a human head, identifiable through a carved hairline similar in style to that of the main figures, though it is impossible to tell if the head is male or female. The larger male faces in one direction, the female and smaller male in the other.  To compound the complication of the scene, it appears that the female sits on top of the larger male’s penis, which is actually directed towards the smaller male.

Only a small number of similar erotic knife handles are known, and all come from Britain.  The only example to come from a datable archaeological context is from St Albans, which was discovered in 4th Century layers, and the other examples are assumed to be contemporary.  All but one of the other examples are folding knives.

All of the known examples share a similar theme in that they feature three figures, though none are identical.  Other examples have the smaller male holding nothing or an oversized penis.  The Syston handle is the first to feature a severed head.  Although the other examples all feature the smaller male supporting the female, the sexual interaction in the other examples is clearly between the larger male and the female.

So the specific imagery on this knife handle, particularly the gruesome addition of the severed head and the interaction between the males, mark it out as different from its contemporaries but at present the exact meaning of the imagery, whether ceremonial or perverted, remains a mystery.

Other ‘Stories from The Collection’ posts