The latest British Museum touring exhibition doing the rounds is currently residing at the Herbert in Coventry, and having failed to make it down to Norwich to see it at its previous venue, I was very pleased to be able to head across this evening to not only look around the exhibition, but also attend a very good lecture on Roman numismatics, of which more later.
I have to start with a tiny grumble, though not one that the Herbert has any control over. Its something that afflicts every BM touring exhibition - a ban on gallery photography. I get why some exhibitions have copyright problems, but the archaeology in this show doesn't suffer from this hindrance. Likewise, some material is susceptible to light damage, but only allowing non-flash photography is now standard in most institutions. There are no photographic restrictions when the objects are on display in the BM or in their local galleries, so why the change in policy when they are part of a formal exhibition like this? It feels like such a backward step when we should be encouraging people to share their gallery experiences and promote the subject in the process.
But enough with the grumbles as the exhibition is very good, and strikes a lovely balance between BM material (British and international in nature) and local material. This is a nice parallel with the study of Roman archaeology in general, which can vary hugely in scale between the truly classical and international and the incredibly local picture encountered in the different parts of Roman Britain. A particularly nice example of this was the film of the Herbert's archaeology curator, Paul Thompson, teleporting around the Midlands to talk about local sites, which I really enjoyed.
Some of the objects on show are wonderful, and the selection for a touring show is adventurous. Items like the gilded bronze Hercules from Birdoswald, the stone carving of Horus in armour, the flourite 'Crawford Cup', and the variety of fine marble tomb monuments and altars are objects of the highest quality and benefit from the detailed attention they are given. Also to be lauded is the decision to place so many of them on open display. The lack of a pane of glass between viewer and object, as we all know, enhances the experience immensely.
On a more local level, it was an unexpected thrill to see items such as the Mars rider figurine from Norton Disney and a votive plaque with Vulcan from the famous Barkway hoard - both items I only knew from photographs and had not expected to come face to face with during my visit. I was also very happy to see the coins and pot from the Selby coin hoard, which I have previously blogged about because of the funky science used to examine it.
One area where photography was allowed was a neat section where visitors can step into a Roman coin and become the Imperial portrait of Constantius Chlorus, father of Constantine the Great.
The second element of the trip was a very enjoyable evening lecture by Dr Clare Rowan of Warwick University. Her topic was 'Coinage and Communication in the Roman Empire', which she tackled with palpable enthusiasm, keeping a good balance between the development of Roman coinage and its myriad imagery and social contexts. Her blog on Roman numismatics can be seen here, and is well worth checking out.
Showing posts with label british museum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label british museum. Show all posts
Friday, 11 July 2014
Friday, 6 June 2014
8 stunning mummies at the British Museum
Cutting edge technology and archaeology go together extremely well these days, but it's fair to say that when it comes to museums, displays tend to be a little behind the curve for a whole host of reasons. The British Museum's 'Ancient Lives New Discoveries' exhibition, more commonly being referred to as '8 mummies', raises the bar substantially on a number of levels. It's also fair to say that it marks a spectacular return to form for our national flagship institution after the lukewarm reception to the Vikings.
The concept of the exhibition is simple. 8 Egyptian mummies from the BM's collections which have never before been unwrapped have been intensively studied through the use of non-destructive CT scanning, and the results of this analysis presented. The experience is therefore twofold - one is the story of the people themselves, the other a demonstration of the power of modern scientific investigation.
The ethics surrounding the storage and display of human remains are dealt with succinctly at the start of the exhibition, and I've heard that images of the displays are available at the ticketing desk for those unsure if the content will be suitable for them or their little ones. I'm pleased but not at all surprised that I didn't hear a word of objection to the display of the remains while in the gallery.
The individuals being highlighted cover a long period of time, and a variety of mummification processes, from a body naturally preserved in the desert in c.3500BC through the heydays of 'proper' mummification, some unusual practices from Roman Egypt and ending with a Christian Sudanese mummy dating to c.AD700.
Each mummy is presented in a clean, simple and respectful manner, with labels about the individual placed near to, but outside of the display case. This approach of not directly labelling an individual (as one might a an object such as a pot) proves to be a subtle but effective technique in retaining the humanity of the person and not reducing them to the status of 'museum object'. It's a good method and one that should be considered by any museum displaying human remains.
Close to each body is a large scale animation of the full CT scan, displayed on high quality screens. In most cases, as the body is unwrapped, this is the time that the actual person is revealed, hidden and huddled within their bindings. The animations cycle through the layers of the body, showing how the body relates to the outer casing and clearly demonstrating surviving organic matter such as organs, and various amulets and the like. Even the way the animations work is super slick - the fluidity of the layers appearing and disappearing means that it's easy to get mesmerised and watch a few complete cycles before turning away.
Alongside this are interactive versions of the CT scans. Using a very neat touch-operated wheel visitors can rotate or zoom in on the scan as appropriate to discover a certain feature for themselves. What's particularly good about this is that the CT scans aren't something produced for the sake of the exhibition - they're the real thing, as used by the specialists and scientists. Having visitors engage with real material this way is a masterstroke, and evidence of how science doesn't need to be dumbed down for public consumption.
Alongside the body and the scans were cases of material illustrative of the life or occupation of that individual, but these also used technology to great effect, for example through the CT scans of the contents of a canopic jar and through 3D prints of body parts and amulets taken directly from the CT scans. This latter approach feels revolutionary in a museum context - not only can the existence of an object be identified through non-invasive scanning, but an exact replica can be created in 3D and placed in a display case next to it. We're definitely through the looking glass now, people!
The fact that the bodies haven't been unwrapped is of course wonderful for their future preservation, but more than that, it actually adds to the experience. Being able to see the digital version of the body in some way actually enhances the experience as the relationship between the body and it's 'container' is preserved. By comparison, having a body lying flat next to that container somehow wouldn't have the same impact. Not being able to see the body for real actually makes it feel more special and more of a privilege.
The final body on display has an unusual twist. The c.AD700 body of a woman from Sudan has a tattoo showing a monogram of St Michael. This unexpected survival (though sadly I failed to see it on the actual body) is a great story, as it was the rise of Christianity that brought an end to the practice of mummification. A suitable way to round off the journey indeed.
If I have the tiniest grumble, it was that sometimes the layout meant that the dividing lines between one mummy's accompanying material and the next were blurred, and a feeling of a new chapter opening with each new individual was diminished. As I said, though, it's an incredibly minor point.
Overall, the exhibition breaks new ground in the presentation of cutting edge scientific research to the public, but also in displaying human remains in a way that is respectful, personal and touching. Absolutely superb.
The concept of the exhibition is simple. 8 Egyptian mummies from the BM's collections which have never before been unwrapped have been intensively studied through the use of non-destructive CT scanning, and the results of this analysis presented. The experience is therefore twofold - one is the story of the people themselves, the other a demonstration of the power of modern scientific investigation.
The ethics surrounding the storage and display of human remains are dealt with succinctly at the start of the exhibition, and I've heard that images of the displays are available at the ticketing desk for those unsure if the content will be suitable for them or their little ones. I'm pleased but not at all surprised that I didn't hear a word of objection to the display of the remains while in the gallery.
The individuals being highlighted cover a long period of time, and a variety of mummification processes, from a body naturally preserved in the desert in c.3500BC through the heydays of 'proper' mummification, some unusual practices from Roman Egypt and ending with a Christian Sudanese mummy dating to c.AD700.
Each mummy is presented in a clean, simple and respectful manner, with labels about the individual placed near to, but outside of the display case. This approach of not directly labelling an individual (as one might a an object such as a pot) proves to be a subtle but effective technique in retaining the humanity of the person and not reducing them to the status of 'museum object'. It's a good method and one that should be considered by any museum displaying human remains.
Close to each body is a large scale animation of the full CT scan, displayed on high quality screens. In most cases, as the body is unwrapped, this is the time that the actual person is revealed, hidden and huddled within their bindings. The animations cycle through the layers of the body, showing how the body relates to the outer casing and clearly demonstrating surviving organic matter such as organs, and various amulets and the like. Even the way the animations work is super slick - the fluidity of the layers appearing and disappearing means that it's easy to get mesmerised and watch a few complete cycles before turning away.
Alongside this are interactive versions of the CT scans. Using a very neat touch-operated wheel visitors can rotate or zoom in on the scan as appropriate to discover a certain feature for themselves. What's particularly good about this is that the CT scans aren't something produced for the sake of the exhibition - they're the real thing, as used by the specialists and scientists. Having visitors engage with real material this way is a masterstroke, and evidence of how science doesn't need to be dumbed down for public consumption.
Alongside the body and the scans were cases of material illustrative of the life or occupation of that individual, but these also used technology to great effect, for example through the CT scans of the contents of a canopic jar and through 3D prints of body parts and amulets taken directly from the CT scans. This latter approach feels revolutionary in a museum context - not only can the existence of an object be identified through non-invasive scanning, but an exact replica can be created in 3D and placed in a display case next to it. We're definitely through the looking glass now, people!
The fact that the bodies haven't been unwrapped is of course wonderful for their future preservation, but more than that, it actually adds to the experience. Being able to see the digital version of the body in some way actually enhances the experience as the relationship between the body and it's 'container' is preserved. By comparison, having a body lying flat next to that container somehow wouldn't have the same impact. Not being able to see the body for real actually makes it feel more special and more of a privilege.
The final body on display has an unusual twist. The c.AD700 body of a woman from Sudan has a tattoo showing a monogram of St Michael. This unexpected survival (though sadly I failed to see it on the actual body) is a great story, as it was the rise of Christianity that brought an end to the practice of mummification. A suitable way to round off the journey indeed.
If I have the tiniest grumble, it was that sometimes the layout meant that the dividing lines between one mummy's accompanying material and the next were blurred, and a feeling of a new chapter opening with each new individual was diminished. As I said, though, it's an incredibly minor point.
Overall, the exhibition breaks new ground in the presentation of cutting edge scientific research to the public, but also in displaying human remains in a way that is respectful, personal and touching. Absolutely superb.
Labels:
archaeology,
british museum,
egypt,
exhibition,
mummy,
museum,
science
Wednesday, 21 May 2014
Vikings at the British Museum - warrior or wimp?
Having finally had chance to visit the British Museum's latest archaeological blockbuster, I couldn't help but share my thoughts on an exhibition that has divided viewers. I confess that, after hearing the views of various colleagues and reading less than congratulatory reviews in both the mainstream media and the museum / archaeology press, it was with some trepidation that I entered the British Museum's new Sainsbury Wing to explore the world of the Vikings.
Exhibitions often win or lose their audience at the very first hurdle and the Vikings didn't get off to an auspicious start for me. The location of the introductory interpretation wasn't clear and the chance to clearly set out the geographical and temporal constraints of the exhibition and the key curatorial messages lost. The content of the first room didn't help with this either. The first few display cases seemed to talk more about the Slavs, Balts and Franks than the Vikings, and overhearing comments from other visitors reinforced my own feelings of confusion about how this early content fitted into the story of the Vikings, and what the message of the exhibition actually was.
Equally confusing was the labelling, which made it difficult to match individual objects to their interpretation. In fact, many objects simply weren't interpreted individually at all - instead existing as groups of objects displayed as grave assemblages, hoards or thematic groups. Without some prior knowledge of the terminology being used, I can imagine that many visitors simply failed to understand what they were looking at. One good point was that at least the captions were produced twice, avoiding a problem encountered in previous BM exhibitions of low level captions being hidden from most of the people viewing the case.
Another issue which struck me like a hammer on first entry was just what an endless sea of grey everything was. I can almost imagine the design conversation - Walls? Grey. Ceiling? Grey. Case interiors? Grey. Interpretation panels? Pink. Just kidding, make them grey too. I'm sure the idea was to make the gold, silver and amber look vibrant in contrast, but it really didn't work for me, and the monochrome expanse actually became quite depressing. Combined with the fact that many cases contained near identical material, it made the experience feel repetitive. Seriously - visit the exhibition and count how many pairs of tortoise brooches there are in different cases!
Before you start to feel that this review is full of nothing but negativity, let me reassure you that the assembled objects really are special. For a people that didn't leave us a huge amount of distinct material culture, the object selection is first rate. Part of the problem seemed to me to be one of the fundamental difficulties when presenting archaeological objects - many of them are small. The detail, and the wonder of so many of these items is undeniably in the detail, is lost behind glass and crowds. There are no enlargements or graphics to enable the visitor to easily marvel at the tiny decoration and discover each object's personality. Instead, every small gold, silver, copper alloy or bone item looks vaguely the same, which is a huge shame as the objects are genuinely wonderful and many of them worthy of lengthy and detailed examination. Such objects need to be displayed in a way that promotes patience from visitors, especially since many will have been so recently wowed by the large scale and easily appreciable splendour of the Pompeii exhibition.
The exhibition feels like the proverbial game of two halves. The first half is confined within tighter corridors, but the second opens into a single large, open plan area, centred around the star of the show - one of the Roskilde boats. I had been disappointed before visiting to learn that the boat was actually more frame than object and was almost ready to criticise it before even seeing it. On standing before it, however, I confess I was very impressed. The frame is a work of art in its own right, showing the sinuous beauty of the craft to great effect, and positioned cleverly within the gallery, allowing it to be seen from many angles and different heights. The displays surrounding it are equally good, effortlessly explaining the manufacture and use of these sleek icons with some wonderfully surviving and evocative organic remains and neat video presentations. They feel like they have been created by a different curator than the earlier displays, and almost as if they belong to a different exhibition.
This large space also contains the more traditional part of the Viking story - that of warfare and raiding. I was excited to see elements of the Viking mass grave excavated in Dorset a few years ago, having recently read about it in Current Archaeology. However, I completely agree with Mike Pitts in his exhibition review - it would have been great to have this example of Anglo Saxons killing Vikings elevated to a position near the start of the exhibition to turn the stereotypes of who was the butcher and who the butchered on its head and engage visitors right from the first room.
So, despite the criticisms, how did the exhibition make me feel? As a Romanist, the Vikings have never held me in total thrall as a culture, but I hoped that this exhibition would open my eyes to the complex social and cultural world of the 8th, 9th and 10th centuries and give me a greater understanding of a time period so often oversimplified to raids and monastery burnings. Sadly, the overall narrative was lost on me and I'm not sure I could tell someone much more about the Vikings than I could when I walked in. However, a number of the objects, not least the Roskilde boat, were truly stunning and very memorable. Despite my reservations over some of the display choices, the sheer quality of them stays with me and makes it difficult for me to look back on my time in the exhibition entirely negatively. It was certainly an exhibition that started slowly but ended on a high.
As for the new exhibition gallery itself, I'm not the first to say that it feels like a characterless modern box, and it certainly lacks the charm and personality of the Reading Room. Hopefully its versatility will come to the fore in future exhibitions and its probably unfair to judge its success (or otherwise) so soon and on only one exhibition. However, a greater injection of vibrancy in future would be welcome to make the displays more of a celebration of the past than a mausoleum.
Exhibitions often win or lose their audience at the very first hurdle and the Vikings didn't get off to an auspicious start for me. The location of the introductory interpretation wasn't clear and the chance to clearly set out the geographical and temporal constraints of the exhibition and the key curatorial messages lost. The content of the first room didn't help with this either. The first few display cases seemed to talk more about the Slavs, Balts and Franks than the Vikings, and overhearing comments from other visitors reinforced my own feelings of confusion about how this early content fitted into the story of the Vikings, and what the message of the exhibition actually was.
Equally confusing was the labelling, which made it difficult to match individual objects to their interpretation. In fact, many objects simply weren't interpreted individually at all - instead existing as groups of objects displayed as grave assemblages, hoards or thematic groups. Without some prior knowledge of the terminology being used, I can imagine that many visitors simply failed to understand what they were looking at. One good point was that at least the captions were produced twice, avoiding a problem encountered in previous BM exhibitions of low level captions being hidden from most of the people viewing the case.
Another issue which struck me like a hammer on first entry was just what an endless sea of grey everything was. I can almost imagine the design conversation - Walls? Grey. Ceiling? Grey. Case interiors? Grey. Interpretation panels? Pink. Just kidding, make them grey too. I'm sure the idea was to make the gold, silver and amber look vibrant in contrast, but it really didn't work for me, and the monochrome expanse actually became quite depressing. Combined with the fact that many cases contained near identical material, it made the experience feel repetitive. Seriously - visit the exhibition and count how many pairs of tortoise brooches there are in different cases!
Before you start to feel that this review is full of nothing but negativity, let me reassure you that the assembled objects really are special. For a people that didn't leave us a huge amount of distinct material culture, the object selection is first rate. Part of the problem seemed to me to be one of the fundamental difficulties when presenting archaeological objects - many of them are small. The detail, and the wonder of so many of these items is undeniably in the detail, is lost behind glass and crowds. There are no enlargements or graphics to enable the visitor to easily marvel at the tiny decoration and discover each object's personality. Instead, every small gold, silver, copper alloy or bone item looks vaguely the same, which is a huge shame as the objects are genuinely wonderful and many of them worthy of lengthy and detailed examination. Such objects need to be displayed in a way that promotes patience from visitors, especially since many will have been so recently wowed by the large scale and easily appreciable splendour of the Pompeii exhibition.
The exhibition feels like the proverbial game of two halves. The first half is confined within tighter corridors, but the second opens into a single large, open plan area, centred around the star of the show - one of the Roskilde boats. I had been disappointed before visiting to learn that the boat was actually more frame than object and was almost ready to criticise it before even seeing it. On standing before it, however, I confess I was very impressed. The frame is a work of art in its own right, showing the sinuous beauty of the craft to great effect, and positioned cleverly within the gallery, allowing it to be seen from many angles and different heights. The displays surrounding it are equally good, effortlessly explaining the manufacture and use of these sleek icons with some wonderfully surviving and evocative organic remains and neat video presentations. They feel like they have been created by a different curator than the earlier displays, and almost as if they belong to a different exhibition.
This large space also contains the more traditional part of the Viking story - that of warfare and raiding. I was excited to see elements of the Viking mass grave excavated in Dorset a few years ago, having recently read about it in Current Archaeology. However, I completely agree with Mike Pitts in his exhibition review - it would have been great to have this example of Anglo Saxons killing Vikings elevated to a position near the start of the exhibition to turn the stereotypes of who was the butcher and who the butchered on its head and engage visitors right from the first room.
So, despite the criticisms, how did the exhibition make me feel? As a Romanist, the Vikings have never held me in total thrall as a culture, but I hoped that this exhibition would open my eyes to the complex social and cultural world of the 8th, 9th and 10th centuries and give me a greater understanding of a time period so often oversimplified to raids and monastery burnings. Sadly, the overall narrative was lost on me and I'm not sure I could tell someone much more about the Vikings than I could when I walked in. However, a number of the objects, not least the Roskilde boat, were truly stunning and very memorable. Despite my reservations over some of the display choices, the sheer quality of them stays with me and makes it difficult for me to look back on my time in the exhibition entirely negatively. It was certainly an exhibition that started slowly but ended on a high.
As for the new exhibition gallery itself, I'm not the first to say that it feels like a characterless modern box, and it certainly lacks the charm and personality of the Reading Room. Hopefully its versatility will come to the fore in future exhibitions and its probably unfair to judge its success (or otherwise) so soon and on only one exhibition. However, a greater injection of vibrancy in future would be welcome to make the displays more of a celebration of the past than a mausoleum.
Labels:
archaeology,
british museum,
exhibition,
museum,
viking
Saturday, 20 April 2013
Pompeii and Herculaneum at the British Museum and the Roman Finds Group conference
It was a case of Pompeii overload yesterday as I attended the Roman Finds Group's conference at the British Museum and went into the related Pompeii and Herculaneum exhibition not once, but twice during the day.
Professor Laurence took us back outside the houses to the streets that surround them, and certainly made me reflect that, in my ignorance, I had always taken a very 21st Century view of streets and roads - seeing them very much as simply places for traffic to travel down. An increase in scholarship over the last decade or so has started to change our understanding of the role and use of streets, not just in the way that carts and pack animals used or, just as importantly, didn't use them, but also in how the location of shops, water features and shrines indicate how the streetscape was a place for socialising and the teaching of children, and certainly not just somewhere for vehicles to trundle down.
Dr Jones' talk focussed around a single amphora, broken during the earthquake of AD62/3 and buried when the bar it was in was repaired. Inside the broken amphora was a brown soil, which when sieved revealed thousands of tiny fish bones - evidence that its contents were 'garum', the fermented fish sauce the Romans were so fond of. Analysis of the bones and ceramic fabric has revealed that the sauce contained bonito and sardinella fish, and was made on the Spanish / Portuguese border.
This was demonstrated through the study of glass vessels and loomweights from Insula VI.1. The glass vessel assemblage showed the emergence of blown glass and a greater variety of forms in the years leading up to the eruption. In the case of loomweights, the assemblage suggested that, in contrast to the glass, older warp weighted loom technology was still in use at a time when it had been superseded in other places, even in Britain. However, rather than being seen as evidence of Pompeii being backwards, this is evidence of the traditional role of the Roman matron as a provider of cloth for her family, and these antique loomweights therefore served an important purpose, but not one directly related to their function. They were symbols of respectability and tradition.
To mention the excellent conference first, its not my intention to break down every word said by every speaker, but here are some of the more thought-provoking things they said, as I saw it.
Dr Paul Roberts (British Museum) - 'Life and Death in Pompeii and Herculaneum'
Dr Roberts is the lead curator of the exhibition and gave an honest and personal account of the displays, to which he has clearly committed a lot of time and love. As you'll read below, I think he's pulled it off magnificently. His pleas to Roman specialists to try and understand the limitations and intended audience of museum exhibition interpretation was particularly familiar to anyone who has been involved in constructing displays.
It was also interesting to note that 95% of the exhibition's content has come from Italy (much of it leaving the country for the first time), and that this is the first exhibition to feature both Pompeii and Herculaneum in the title, giving the smaller site an equal billing that it so richly deserves.
It was also interesting to note that 95% of the exhibition's content has come from Italy (much of it leaving the country for the first time), and that this is the first exhibition to feature both Pompeii and Herculaneum in the title, giving the smaller site an equal billing that it so richly deserves.
Professor Ray Laurence (University of Kent) - 'Pompeii: from City Streets to People and Houses'
Professor Laurence took us back outside the houses to the streets that surround them, and certainly made me reflect that, in my ignorance, I had always taken a very 21st Century view of streets and roads - seeing them very much as simply places for traffic to travel down. An increase in scholarship over the last decade or so has started to change our understanding of the role and use of streets, not just in the way that carts and pack animals used or, just as importantly, didn't use them, but also in how the location of shops, water features and shrines indicate how the streetscape was a place for socialising and the teaching of children, and certainly not just somewhere for vehicles to trundle down.
Alex Croom (Tyne and Wear Museums) - 'Housework in the homes of Pompeii and Herculaneum'
Alex Croom looked back inside people's houses, to the furniture and evidence of household activities. This stems from her own research in recreating the furniture for the interior of the various buildings reconstructed at Arbeia Roman fort in South Shields. Issues such as the use of chests and cupboards for longer and shorter term storage (including practical issues such as how sticky used oil lamps become), the fashion of having crisp laundered creases in clothes and even what the Romans stuffed their mattresses with were all tackled. Even the issue of toilets, chamber pots and dealing with cess pits were discussed - a dirty thought but of course a necessity of life and a practical issue every household had to deal with.
Dr Andrew Jones (University of York) - 'One pot and its story'
In a shorter talk, Dr Jones introduced the 'AAPP' - the Anglo American Project in Pompeii, and he was the first of a number of speakers talking about their involvement with that project. The AAPP has been re-excavating Insula VI.1, just inside the Herculanean gate (at the top left of the plan below).
Dr Ria Berg (Institutum Romanum Finlandiae) - 'Did all Pompeiian women have mirrors?'
Dr Berg's research has investigated the frequency and distribution of mirrors and other 'mundus muliebris' (toilet articles) in Pompeii. She discovered that most mirrors were found in domestic contexts, rather than as possessions gathered by fleeing inhabitants and discovered with their bodies. Only around half of the houses she studied had mirrors, and these usually only contained one. Only the largest houses had more than one mirror (such as the House of the Menander and the House of Paquius Proculus). The location of these mirrors revealed that they were usually stored with other toiletry articles, but in more general storage cupboards rather than in bedroom settings.
Equally interesting was the number of mirrors found in buildings that might have served as brothels ('luparnar'), suggesting some form of communal use, or represent the personal grooming of the girls working there.
Equally interesting was the number of mirrors found in buildings that might have served as brothels ('luparnar'), suggesting some form of communal use, or represent the personal grooming of the girls working there.
David Griffiths (University of Leicester) - 'From dusk 'til dawn: lamps and lighting in Pompeii'
David Griffiths was the second speaker involved in the AAPP project, and his research centres around the socio-cultural and economic implications of lighting in the Roman world. His study of the lamps from Insula VI.1, specifically those from the House of the Surgeon, demonstrated the growth in artificial light throughout the 1st Century BC. His work in progress on the amount of olive oil required to light certain homes, business and public buildings is a fascinating step into the more practical realities of keeping the many oil lamps required to light a busy town burning.
Dr Hilary Cool (Barbican Research Associates) - 'Becoming Consumers: the inhabitants of a Pompeiian insula and their things'
Dr Cool's talk opened by challenging just how representative the fabulous material remains from Pompeii are of Roman towns across the empire. By looking at the objects in use at the point of the eruption, a unique picture of older objects still in use combined with emerging fashions and technology can be gained.
Dr Richard Hobbs (British Museum) - 'Small change in ancient Pompeii'
The conference was entertaining completed by Dr Hobbs, another speaker involved in the AAPP project. The coinage recovered from the excavations at Insula VI.1 have presented a large and unique assemblage of 1,500 coins, particularly important for determining exactly what coinage was in circulation at the time of the eruption.
The most fascinating element of the talk, though, was the series of coins of the 2nd Century BC from Marseilles (Massilia) and Ibiza (Ebusus). These were imported into Campania, possibly even in one large, deliberate shipment, but then copied locally. The Ebusus coinage is particularly interesting as it features imagery of the Egyptian dwarf god Bes. Dr Hobbs proposed that this image may have been chosen because of Bes' associations with wine and merriment, and that these early coins were being introduced to be used in such contexts.
The most fascinating element of the talk, though, was the series of coins of the 2nd Century BC from Marseilles (Massilia) and Ibiza (Ebusus). These were imported into Campania, possibly even in one large, deliberate shipment, but then copied locally. The Ebusus coinage is particularly interesting as it features imagery of the Egyptian dwarf god Bes. Dr Hobbs proposed that this image may have been chosen because of Bes' associations with wine and merriment, and that these early coins were being introduced to be used in such contexts.
So there you have it. A very well organised conference with a great range of entertaining speakers which complemented the themes of the exhibition well, and provided a wonderful insight into the new research being carried out in these most fascinating of archaeological sites. Huge thanks are due to the Roman Finds Group for arranging it.
The British Museum's exhibition 'Life and Death in Pompeii and Herculaneum' was one that I've been dying to see ever since I first heard about it being planned through the museum grapevine about 3 years ago. I'm delighted to say that it lived up to my every expectation - which not every well-hyped exhibition does.
The first thing to say is that the object selection truly is stunning. The range of iconic objects is second to none, and it must have been a nightmare transporting and installing some of them, let alone managing issues such as environmental controls and security.
Chief among these awkward displays has to be the reconstructed garden fresco from the Villa Arianna at Boscoreale. The effect is wonderful, and reminded me of the display of the garden frescoes from Livia's vill at Prima Porta in Rome's Palazzo Massimo.
The second triumph is simply the approach and layout. Pompeii and Herculaneum are far too often talked about in fatalistic terms, but this exhibition is about life rather than death. The decision to focus on the Roman home was a brave one, as it means that many facets of the sites are omitted entirely (I don't remember a single brothel reference or mention of the amphitheatre and its famous riot for instance) but it works wonderfully. The use of the layout of Pompeii's House of the Tragic Poet as a model for displaying artefacts in domestic room groupings, with effective but understated set dressing and sound effects worked a treat, and gave the objects from different houses a unity that most books on Pompeii struggle to achieve.
The inevitable Pompeiian body casts were there of course (including the headlining dog), but were wisely limited in number and handled very sensitively, and the interpretation and selections of possessions displayed alongside them made their stories touchingly human.
The carbonised wooden furniture from Herculaneum was perhaps the star of the show, as even going to visit the sites doesn't present the opportunity to see them, which is a real shame. The baby's cradle rightly attracts a lot of attention, but the whole selection of tables, chests and decorative fragments are mind blowing to those of us used to Romano-British archaeology, and it takes a conscious effort to remind yourself just how old they are, and that they're not replicas.
There has been a fashion in British Museum exhibitions over the last few years to have a video presentation of some kind, but the one shown here is definitely a more engaging and graphically inventive presentation than ever before, with some nice playing with words to describe the progress of the eruption, while at the same time linking the ancient city of Pompeii with the modern inhabitants of the Bay of Naples.
So did I enjoy it? Absolutely. Will I go back and see it again? Hopefully. Is it as good as going and seeing the sites for yourself? Not quite, but it is one of the most engaging exhibitions the British Museum has put on in years and deserves all of the plaudits it receives.
So did I enjoy it? Absolutely. Will I go back and see it again? Hopefully. Is it as good as going and seeing the sites for yourself? Not quite, but it is one of the most engaging exhibitions the British Museum has put on in years and deserves all of the plaudits it receives.
Labels:
archaeology,
british museum,
conference,
exhibition,
herculaneum,
london,
museum,
pompeii,
roman,
roman finds group
Sunday, 26 February 2012
China: Journey to Sheffield
Weston Park museum in Sheffield is currently hosting a British Museum touring exhibition – 'China : Journey to the East'. Having wanted to go and see it for a while (only partly due to my wife having a hand in installing it), I finally got the chance to go this afternoon.
The exhibition, though not the largest you’ll ever see, takes a look at a variety of aspects of Chinese culture, ancient and modern, through 4 themes – food and drink, festivals and belief, technology and play. The objects are mostly from the British Museum , though the objects from Sheffield ’s own collections and those of Manchester Museum by no means play second fiddle.
The Sheffield Museums’ contribution mainly takes the form of items from the Grice Ivories collection, which I confess I knew nothing of before today, but will definitely not forget. My images below most definitely do not do justice to the quality of craftsmanship on show.
I was also particularly taken with the (beautifully displayed against a lightbox) shadow puppets of characters from Journey to the West – the Chinese classic tale of the Tang Dynasty monk Tripitaka’s journey to collect Buddhist scrolls from India, with a little help from a magical monkey of course.
Another group of objects also caught my eye, though I think most visitors would pass by them with little thought. It’s the group of preserved pastries from the Astana cemetery in Xinjiang. Apart from being fascinatingly preserved funerary objects, astute regular readers may remember that I was fortune enough to pay a visit to Astana cemetery during my trip to Xinjiang last year.
The exhibition continues until 9th April, so you’ve got no excuse for not going to see it for yourself!
Labels:
british museum,
china,
exhibition,
museum,
sheffield
Friday, 23 December 2011
The sexy science of coin hoards
OK, hold everything. I’ve just seen the best thing ever!
The latest Money and Medals newsletter (what do you mean you don’t read it? Check out the website here) has a piece by Richard Abdy of the British Museum about the preliminary study of a Roman coin hoard found near Selby in North Yorkshire . The hoard is an interesting enough find in itself – an Antonine hoard of around 300 denarii still contained within two pots – but the technology being employed by Southampton University to analyse the coins while still inside the pot is quite simply the ‘sexiest thing ever’™
The team at the spectacularly named ‘μ-VIS Centre for Multidisciplinary, Multiscale,Microtomographic Volume Imaging’ were able to produce 3D scans of the hoard such as the one above*. However, as Dr Abdy explains, the technology goes far beyond such images, special as they are, as it allows individual layers inside the hoard to be stripped back - revealing individual coins, even when corroded, stuck to other coins and slap bang in the centre of the pot. These can even be rotated to enable identification from different angles and with different light sources.
Although coin hoards are not commonly found sealed inside their containers, until now the only real option to study such coins without physically removing them has been through x-radiography. This has its drawbacks such as not allowing layers to be individually examined, not allowing coins to be studied when not face on, and showing obverse and reverse details superimposed, as the x-ray of this sestertius of Nero from the Lincoln museum numismatics collections demonstrates quite clearly.
Of course, the real wow factor of such new technology is that such amazing details can be extracted without a single coin being disturbed. Although not available for every find, the possibilities of such technology in the future are quite mouth-watering.
*I’ve reproduced the image from the newsletter – if anyone from the BM or Southampton University objects to me using it, please let me know and I’ll remove it!
Labels:
archaeology,
british museum,
coins,
culture,
lincoln,
museum,
numismatics
Monday, 7 March 2011
Agatha Christie, Assyrian treasure and face-cream conservation
The British Museum has decided to put on a small exhibition next week about some rather unusual objects, or at least objects with an unusual story to tell. They have been in the museum since being purchased for £1.2million 25 years ago, but have never before been on display.
The objects are a series of ivories from the Assyrian city of Nimrud, excavated in the 1940’s by Max Mallowan, the second husband of Agatha Christie. The tiny, gilded figures, originally made to decorate furniture, are miniature masterpieces of sculpture, and still bear some traces of the gilding and jeweled inlay that originally adorned them. Some even still carry the signs of burning that signal the demise of the city 2,600 years ago.
![]() |
| Images from www.britishmuseum.org |
Sadly (should that even be criminally?), the ivories that remained in Iraq appear to have been damaged during the Iraq war – either trampled in the looting of the museum or, with horrific irony, damaged by flooding of the bank vault they had been taken to for protection.
But no tale of (vaguely) antiquarian archaeological discovery would be complete without an element of weirdness. In this instance, it’s the rather unusual conservation methods employed by Christie herself. In her autobiography she writes,
“I had my own favourite tools ... an orange stick, possibly a very fine knitting needle - one season a dentist's tool which he lent, or rather gave me, and a jar of cosmetic face cream, which I found more useful than anything else for gently coaxing the dirt out of the crevices without harming the friable ivory. In fact there was such a run on my face cream that there was nothing left for my poor old face after a couple of weeks!”
Maybe I can persuade our museum conservators to try out the face cream technique – it doesn’t seem to have done the ivories any harm! If only she’d left us the name of the brand she used, we could have got a great sponsorship deal…
Labels:
archaeology,
assyria,
british museum,
culture,
museum
Sunday, 27 February 2011
Old coins and dead Egyptians
It’s a funny old life being a museum curator. I had a very long day in London the other day, getting up far too early to catch a train to get me to the British Museum for 9am. The reason for this act of masochism was that I was attending a conference to celebrate the 150th birthday of the department of coins and medals (though I didn’t even get them a card – I’m a terrible guest!) I have to say that it was worth the effort, with some very good papers on the history of the department and some of the current projects being undertaken in the UK and abroad. The updates on British projects such as the Portable Antiquities Scheme and the progress the BM is making on putting more of its collections online were particularly interesting.
One thing that did make me and a few provincial colleagues smile, though, was the way that some of the senior BM curators were criticising the lack of specialist numismatic posts in some museums, and highlighting how important it is that major research projects continue to be carried out. It seemed to us that that view is slightly out of touch with the reality most museums are facing, when curators of huge collections and entire education and outreach departments are being culled en masse because of government cuts. The luxury of specialist numismatic curators with the time and resources to carry out personal research projects is long gone, and the BM may do well to reflect how lucky they are to still have that role at all.
Having said that, it was a stimulating discussion, and I returned to Lincoln bursting with enthusiasm and ideas for new ways to get all of the people of Lincolnshire crazy about ancient coins.
While I was at the BM, I took the opportunity to go and see their latest exhibition – ‘Book of the Dead’. Now, I have to confess that despite being a history buff, the Egyptians have always left me slightly cold – maybe it was the whole brain out of the nose thing when I was a kid? Anyway, as a fully paid up, card carrying member of the Museums Association, I can get into the BM’s exhibitions for free, and I’m never one to pass up a freebie.
As I went round, I realised that the thoughts going round my head were the same as when I had visited the last few BM blockbuster exhibitions. The objects are as wonderful as you’d expect them to be, the interpretation is informative and well planned and the dome of the reading room makes for a beautiful setting. It should combine to make the perfect experience, but somehow it doesn’t. The popularity of the exhibitions means that the visitor experience is poor. For me, things like the large crowds in front of every case, being hit in the face by some tourist’s rucksack, having some screaming kid push past you the wrong way, or simply just having to stand and wait as you can’t even ignore a case and move on as the throng have created a bottleneck - all combine to just make me want to get through and out again as quickly as possible – and meaning that I take very little enjoyment or knowledge out of the experience. I fail to see how anybody else could either. It’s like an inverse ratio – as popularity increases, enjoyment for the individual visitor decreases.
I think a large part of the problem with this exhibition is that a lot of the objects are papyrus, meaning that you need to be close to them to get any sense of their detail. The last BM exhibitions I really enjoyed were Hadrian and the Terracotta Warriors, and I think it’s no coincidence that they contained larger objects that could be appreciated from a distance. If I could find a time to see this one when it was quiet, I’m sure I’d come away with a far better impression.
I actually went into ‘Book of the Dead’ twice. My first visit was during lunchtime, but I tried again after the conference before my late train home, at about 7 o’clock in the hope it would be quieter. It was actually worse – even more visitors and a child with some clacking toy that its parents evidently enjoyed the sound of.
Ultimately it’s hard to see how the BM can change it – getting lots of people to come to an exhibition is a sign of success, and lord knows the heritage industry in England at the moment needs every good bit of press it can get. I just hope the hoards of other tourists didn’t feel as disappointed as I did, and will continue to come back again and again – if only they could keep away when I’m there…
Labels:
british museum,
coins,
culture,
egypt,
museum,
numismatics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






